Or: How to control the idiot withinHere is a scenario you have likely been involved with if you have had even a short amount of engineering experience.
Someone in a meeting suggests something that is unorthodox. Others dismiss it – maybe even derisively. But the one who put it forward continues to think it is a perfectly good, and logical, idea to pursue further. Neither side agrees with the other nor even understands the other. How can engineers, who should be using sound and rational reasoning to assess all ideas, disagree like this? Surely, they should be able to explain their point in sufficient detail to ensure clarity – and not degrade into unfounded disagreement that seems more like personal preference. The reason for this is that at least one party (probably all) is relying on their instinctive response and they don’t actually understand that response. If you take a moment now, then you can probably recall a time when someone presented you with an idea to which your initial response was just discomfort. You did not know exactly why you felt uneasy with the idea. You might have even acknowledged that their explanation as to why it was a good idea made sense. But still, you simply did not like it. This was your instinct. It might have been right. But if you can’t explain it, then you will not have agreement. And just so you know, engineers can’t say things like “It just doesn't feel right to me” and expect that to be argument enough. For a global engineer, this can be more extreme. If your instincts are based on experience in one context, then those instincts could be perfectly correct for that same context. But in another context, which is more likely to be experienced by a global engineer, the likelihood of it being corrects is much less. You therefore need to dig deeper into your feelings, and turn them into sound logic. Such feelings come from your unconscious, which holds numerous memories. One of these memories was triggered by the idea put to you. Something you experienced in some way suggests this idea would not work. So your job is to delve deeper into your mind and find what it is that generates this feeling. This is much easier said than done. You will likely need to sleep on it before you realise what caused this feeling. However, as you continue to put effort into accepting the feeling for what it is and then trying to extract what caused the feeling, you will get better at this. Eventually, you will find that you can extract this information in moments and with little effort – because you have created the mental paths that allow for easy flow. The other side of this same story is when you come up with an idea, but others just don’t get it. And you don’t know how to explain it well enough – because it is instinct, and not clear thought. This time, the idea came from the same place as did your unease with other people’s ideas. And without those mental pathways, you just can’t get the important knowledge out to create the argument you need to explain what you are thinking. Once again, you need to work at it – until it eventually becomes something that happens in the moment. Once you do this, you will:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorClint Steele is an expert in how engineering skills are influenced by your background and how you can enhance them once you understand yourself. He has written a book on the - The Global Engineer - and this blog delves further into the topic. Archives
July 2026
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed